L'Autorité dissimulée - l'autorité manifeste. L'écriture de la violence chez Yasmina Khadra - Thèses - Limag
Recherche en cours
Veuillez patienter
Thèse

HARTLING, Simon
L'Autorité dissimulée - l'autorité manifeste. L'écriture de la violence chez Yasmina Khadra
 
Lieu : Växjö, Linnaeus university, Suède
Directeur de thèse : Jörgen Bruhn, Linnaeus university, Suède
Année : 2012
Type : Thèse - Ph. D
Première inscription pour les thèses : , 2006

Notations :

Abstract



Hartling, Simon (2012). L’Autorité dissimulée – l’autorité manifeste. L’écriture de la violence chez Yasmina Khadra .(Dissimulated authority – manifest authority. Yasmina Khadra’s representation of violence), Linnaeus University Dissertations No 98/2012. ISBN: 978-91-86983-79-6. Written in French.



This study examines the representation of violence in two novels by Algerian author Yasmina Khadra (1955 - ): Les Agneaux du Seigneur (1998) and À quoi rêvent les loups (1999). The narrative techniques employed in these texts and, more directly, the assertions made by the author in interviews and autobiographical works give the impression of a writer aiming to impose on the reader a specific view of the Algerian civil war (1992-1998) while at the same time asserting that the novels are objective representations of the same historical period.

This authoritative position, it is argued, is surprising in the light of two dis-courses. According to the first, events of extreme violence are fundamentally inexpressible and therefore any work of art dealing with such events must find a way to express this inexpressibility. Secondly, many historians, journalists and writers argue that the civil war in Algeria was particularly ungraspable, and eludes being rendered affirmatively in any work, fictional or not.

The study aims to explain how Yasmina Khadra construes his authority in the fictional texts and via his performance in the media. The concepts of a dissimulated authority and a manifest authority are conceived in order to elucidate the ambiguous discourse created by Khadra in which we find both a need to convince the reader of the legitimacy of his rendering of the violent events and a tendency to explicitly take control of and guide our interpretation of the novels.

The final chapter of the dissertation argues that Khadra’s prolific use of ani-mal vocabulary at once dissimulates and makes manifest the idea of an author wanting to impose certain ideas and ‘truths’ on the reader. In the conclusion it is suggested that the violence of the novels extends beyond the subject matter into Khadra's very approach to writing: that the two novels do not so much reflect the idea of the violence as a creator of chaos, but rather, in browbeating the reader into a passive role, end up imitating the very forceful-ness and single-mindedness of violence itself.

The methodological approach of the study consists of a close reading as well as a thorough contextualization of the novels. The classical narratological concepts established by Gérard Genette are used to examine the dominant narrative modes of the stories. In explaining the ways in which Khadra proceeds to persuade the reader of the truth-value of the texts the theory on realistic discourse developed by Philippe Hamon constitutes an important reference.



Key words: Yasmina Khadra, Violence, Autorité, Indicible, Littérature algé-rienne, Guerre civile algérienne, Agneaux, Loups.